I don’t often get angry but I have to say that I am angry right now. I am angry that the owner’s of Arborland have decided to push the AATA out of their shopping area after being nice enough to put a bus stop there. I am angry on a number of different levels and I wish there was more that I and other citizens could do to address this problem before it happens.
This is not the first time that the AATA has been told to leave a shopping area. The same thing happen with Maple Village last year after Plum Market moved in. The AATA used to have a Park and Ride Lot there and now it is gone because (so I heard) the owners wanted to make sure there is ample parking for Plum Market and other potential tenants.
Both of these decisions I believe are counter to what Ann Arbor would like to do as a whole to become more pedestrian, transit, and bicycling friendly.
I wrote an email to the Arborland Owners expressing my concerns and I hope you do, too.
There is also some good discussion going on on Arbor Update about this issue that you might want to check out.
So here is my general argument about the bigger picture of why I am concerned about moving the AATA out of Arborland:
1. The move is counter to Ann Arbor’s interest in Transit Oriented Development (TOD). There are several initiatives underway, including the Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update, the Washtenaw Avenue Project, and rezoning of Commerical and Employment centers in Ann Arbor that all are attempting to make it easier for people to get in and around Ann Arbor using all different types of transportation. The decision by Arborland to move the AATA out of their shopping area doesn’t reflect the interests of many in Ann Arbor to create a place where we don’t always have to rely on our cars to get around. This seems to be a point of tension (between City ideals and Business Interests) that will need to be resolved.
2. As our population ages, Ann Arbor will need to become more accommodating to transit, not less: Ann Arbor, like the rest of our country is getting older. And as people get older, they will need to be able to get to places, such as shopping destinations and doctor’s appointments without a car. For safety’s sake, we need to make sure people can get to major shopping destinations without a car.
3. Younger people want access to lots of transportation choices: Yes, younger folks are still driving cars, but they are also more interested in taking the bus and walking or biking to their destination. This is defintely true of UM students, who I am sure shop at Arborland and take the bus to do it. Moving the stop out of Arborland is going to make this a lot less pleasant.
4. Can’t we just all get along? I guess at the end of the day I don’t understand why the folks at Arborland are less interested in figuring out another solution that will accomodate everyone. This move is something I wish we could have more time to discuss and talk about.
5. An issue of access: I also beleive that people of all abilities and ages and incomes should have access to the same shopping options. It concerns me that it will be much more dangerous for those with disabilities, those without cars, those who are elderly, etc. to get to Arborland.
The silver lining: I know that the AATA is working on creating a new bus stop across from Arborland that will serve much the same purpose. I just wish there was more room for discussion.
What you can do: If you are concerned about this move and/or the potential issues I’ve discussed above, please contact Arborland, call the stores and Arborland and let them know how you feel.